SAMR Model for IT use.
|Technology allows for creation of new tasks, previously inconceivable||Use of iBooks Author to create media rich ePub books|
|Technology allows for significant task redesign||Camera function to record oral retells, recording of reading|
|Technology acts as a direct tool substitute, with functional improvement||Basic functions of eBooks are used such as Read To Me and dictionary definitions|
|Technology acts as a direct tool substitute, with no functional change||eBooks are used in reading groups|
SAMR: Puentedura, R. R., Ph.D., SAMR model.
Should we be using technology to replace things that we have always done i.e. online worksheets v photocopied worksheets? Or should we be using the technology to allow our students to do things that have previously been extremely difficult or impossible because the technology was not up to it or available?
Above is a model for teachers to use when considering the use of technology in the classroom. At the bottom of the model is Enhancement. Enhancement refers to using IT to enhance things that we already do. The example given at the Substitution level is using eBooks on an iPad as opposed to using traditional books in reading groups. This may enhance the activity slightly through added sounds and activities within the book but essentially it is the same activity. If you follow this example all the way through to Redefinition the use of eBooks becomes about being an author and publishing for a wider audience (online publishing). This is something that without the technology could not be done before.
The model is about moving towards using tech to redefine (enhancement) student learning and not just using tech to do the same tasks but in a different way i.e. reading an eBook instead of a traditional book. This is not to say it cannot be used as a substitution or to augment but it is not the most powerful way to use technology.
For teachers at PBAS I have one question:
Is this model something that could be added to our Professional Development Foundation document in terms of guiding teachers to use technology at a more involved level?
I think it should go into our professional development document because:
1. With the introduction of iPads at PBAS it is timely to consider a model like this.
2. It is a simple model/concept which is easy for teachers to grasp.
3. If a teacher wants to focus on developing ICT use in their classroom we currently have nothing to guide them at PBAS. This gives us clear guide providing us a common language and reference point as teachers at PBAS.
4. This is a widely used model in the education community.